Selectivity studies, also known as specificity studies, are an integral part of bioanalytical assay validation. These studies determine whether the assay can accurately measure the analyte of interest in the presence of potentially interfering substances, ensuring that the assay is specific to the analyte being measured. Here's how selectivity studies are typically performed:
Selectivity Experiment Design: The study is designed to evaluate potential interference from endogenous substances, metabolites, degradation products, or other analytes that might be present in the sample matrix. Known interfering substances, if identified, are included in the study.
Sample Preparation: A blank matrix (typically the same type of matrix as the study samples, such as plasma or urine) is prepared. The blank matrix is spiked with the analyte of interest at a low concentration (LLOQ) to mimic the lower limit of quantification.
Interfering Substances: If known interfering substances are identified, they are spiked into the blank matrix either individually or in combination with the analyte of interest. Interfering substances might include endogenous compounds, metabolites, or concomitant medications.
Analysis: The spiked samples are then analyzed using the bioanalytical assay. The goal is to determine whether the presence of interfering substances affects the accurate measurement of the analyte.
Data Analysis: The data is analyzed to determine whether the presence of interfering substances results in significant changes in the measured analyte concentration. Statistical analysis may be used to assess the impact of interference.
Acceptance Criteria: Acceptance criteria are established based on regulatory guidelines or predefined criteria. The criteria define the extent to which interference can be tolerated without compromising the accuracy of the assay.
Interpretation: If interference is observed, the laboratory must assess the potential impact on the assay's reliability. Depending on the degree of interference, corrective actions may be taken. These actions could include adjusting the assay conditions, matrix purification, or applying mathematical corrections.
Documentation: The results of the selectivity study, including any observed interferences and the laboratory's response, are thoroughly documented. This documentation serves as a record of how the assay responds to potential interferences.
Example: Selectivity Assessment for Drug Y Assay
Background:
- Drug Y is a new investigational compound intended for treating a specific medical condition.
- The bioanalytical assay measures the concentration of Drug Y in human plasma samples.
- The assay must demonstrate selectivity by accurately measuring Drug Y in the presence of potentially interfering substances commonly found in plasma.
Selectivity Assessment:
Sample Preparation:
- Prepare a set of human plasma samples as blank matrix samples (no Drug Y or interfering substances).
- Prepare spiked samples by adding Drug Y at the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) concentration (e.g., 5 ng/mL) to human plasma.
Interfering Substances:
- Identify known interfering substances that could be present in plasma (e.g., endogenous compounds, metabolites, concomitant medications).
Spiking Interfering Substances:
- Prepare spiked samples by adding the interfering substances to blank plasma samples at relevant concentrations.
Analysis:
- Analyze the spiked samples containing Drug Y alone, spiked samples containing both Drug Y and interfering substances, and blank plasma samples using the bioanalytical assay.
Calculation of Selectivity:
- Calculate the response (peak area or signal) of Drug Y in the presence of interfering substances and compare it to the response of Drug Y alone.
Data Interpretation:
- If the presence of interfering substances does not significantly affect the accuracy and precision of Drug Y measurement, the assay is considered selective.
- Calculate the percent change in response due to interference and assess whether it falls within acceptable limits (e.g., within ±20% of the response without interference).
Threshold for Selectivity:
- Define a threshold for acceptable interference. If the response change is within this threshold, the interference is considered negligible.
Reporting:
- Summarize the results of the selectivity assessment in the bioanalytical validation report.
- Document the interfering substances tested, the concentrations used, and the impact on Drug Y measurement.
Conclusion:
The selectivity assessment demonstrates whether the bioanalytical assay can accurately measure Drug Y in the presence of potential interfering substances commonly found in plasma. If the assay's accuracy and precision remain within acceptable limits in the presence of these interferences, it confirms that the assay is selective for measuring Drug Y.