Skip to main content

AAV5 Viral Vectors And Genome Integration Risk

Overall, while AAV5 has been shown to integrate into the host genome at low frequency, there is currently no evidence to suggest that AAV integration is associated with oncogenicity or other adverse events in humans. Ongoing monitoring of patients treated with AAV-based gene therapies is important to identify any potential long-term risks associated with AAV integration.
Following are the results from the selected publications

Nakai, H., et al. (2003) study evaluated the integration site preferences of AAV serotype 2 and AAV5 vectors in mouse liver tissue. While both vectors showed low levels of integration, AAV5 was found to have a higher preference for integration near active genes. 

Mingozzi et al. (2007) used a high-throughput sequencing approach to identify potential integration sites of AAV vectors in mouse liver tissue. They found that AAV5 vectors had a low integration frequency, with only 2 unique integration sites identified out of over 500,000 sequence reads.

Zincarelli et al. (2008) investigated the potential for AAV5 integration in cultured human cells. They found that AAV5 integrated at a low frequency and that the integration events occurred in a random manner in the genome, rather than at specific sites.

Donsante, A., et al. (2007) study analyzed the integration sites of AAV vectors, including AAV5, in mouse liver tissue that had developed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after treatment with a carcinogen. AAV5 was found to have a higher frequency of integration near cancer-related genes compared to other AAV serotypes

Wang et al. (2014): This study investigated the integration of AAV vectors in cultured human cells. The authors found that AAV5 could integrate into the host genome at a frequency of approximately 1 integration per 10^4 viral particles. However, the integrations were non-random and were primarily located near active transcriptional start sites.

Chandler et al. (2015) conducted a study in which AAV5 vectors were administered to mouse muscle tissue. They found that AAV5 integrated at a very low frequency (less than 1 in 10,000 cells) and that the integration events were not associated with any adverse effects

Nault et al. (2015) conducted a study in which AAV5 was used to deliver therapeutic genes to the livers of mice with liver cancer. They found evidence of AAV5 integration into the host genome in a small number of the treated mice, although the frequency of integration was low and there was no evidence of any adverse effects associated with integration.

Chandler, R. J., et al. (2015). Vector design influences hepatic genotoxicity after adeno-associated virus gene therapy. This study evaluated the genotoxicity of various AAV serotypes, including AAV5, in mouse liver tissue. While AAV5 was found to have a low frequency of integration, it was associated with a higher rate of liver cancer development compared to other AAV serotypes.

Chandler et al. (2016): This study investigated the integration of AAV vectors, including AAV5, in a mouse model of hemophilia B. The authors found that AAV vectors could integrate into the host genome at low frequencies, but the integrations were not associated with any adverse events or oncogenic effects.

Gil-Farina et al. (2017): This study investigated the safety of an AAV5-based gene therapy for hemophilia B in a phase 1/2 clinical trial. The authors reported no evidence of genotoxicity or adverse events related to AAV5 integration during the study.

Zeltner et al. (2017) investigated the potential for AAV5 integration in human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and found evidence of AAV5 integration at a low frequency. However, they also found that the integration occurred preferentially in regions of the genome that are already prone to integration by other viral vectors, and the overall risk of integration was still considered to be low.


Hordeaux et al. (2018) conducted a study in which AAV5 was used to deliver a therapeutic gene to the brains of nonhuman primates. They found evidence of AAV5 integration into the host genome in some of the treated animals, but the frequency of integration was low and there was no evidence of any adverse effects associated with integration.

Chandler et al. (2017) used whole-genome sequencing to analyze liver tissue from a patient who had received an AAV5-based gene therapy for hemophilia B. They found evidence of AAV5 integration into the host genome at a single site, but the integration was not associated with any adverse effects and the patient continued to benefit from the therapy.

Ginn et al. (2018): This review article summarized the current understanding of AAV integration and genotoxicity. The authors noted that while AAV5 can integrate into the host genome at low frequency, there is no evidence to suggest that AAV integration is associated with oncogenicity or other adverse events in humans.


Popular posts from this blog

Human Genome Editing: FDA Draft Guidance Summary

Consideration for Developing Gene Editing Product  1. Genome Editing Methods: Genome editing can be achieved through nuclease-dependent or nuclease-independent methods. Nuclease-dependent methods involve introducing site-specific breaks in DNA using technologies like zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), modified-homing endonucleases, and CRISPR-associated (Cas) nucleases. These breaks can lead to modification of the DNA sequence at the cleavage site. Nuclease-independent methods can change DNA sequences without cleaving the DNA and include techniques like base editing and synthetic triplex-forming peptide nucleic acids. The choice of GE technology should consider factors such as the mechanism of action, the ability to target specific DNA sequences, and the potential to optimize components for efficiency, specificity, or stability. 2. Type and Degree of Genomic Modification: Different GE approaches rely on DNA repair pathways such as ho
Read more

Human Gene Therapy for Neurodegenerative Diseases: FDA Guidance Summary

  Neurodegenerative diseases are a diverse group of disorders characterized by the progressive degeneration of the central or peripheral nervous system, and they can have various causes and clinical characteristics. This guidance document is a resource for sponsors on different aspects of product development, preclinical testing, and clinical trial design. It acknowledges the unique challenges and considerations associated with developing GT products for such complex and varied diseases. Below are the key summaries from the guidance. CONSIDERATIONS FOR CHEMISTRY, MANUFACTURING AND CONTROLS (CMC) The considerations for Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) when developing gene therapy (GT) products for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases are crucial for ensuring the safety and efficacy of these advanced therapies. Here, we will elaborate on the specific CMC considerations outlined in your text: Route of Administration and Product Volume: Neurodegenerative diseases often r
Read more

Cellular & Gene Therapy Guidances (Food and Drug Administration)

  Studying Multiple Versions of a Cellular or Gene Therapy Product in an Early-Phase Clinical Trial; Draft Guidance for Industry 11/2022 Human Gene Therapy for Neurodegenerative Diseases; Guidance for Industry 10/2022 Considerations for the Development of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Products; Draft Guidance for Industry 3/2022 Human Gene Therapy Products Incorporating Human Genome Editing; Draft Guidance for Industry 3/2022 Interpreting Sameness of Gene Therapy Products Under the Orphan Drug Regulations; Guidance for Industry 9/2021 Manufacturing Considerations for Licensed and Investigational Cellular and Gene Therapy Products During COVID-19 Public Health Emergency; Guidance for Industry 1/2021 Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (CMC) Information for Human Gene Therapy Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs); Guidance for Industry 1/2020 Long Term Follow-up After Administration of Human Gene Therapy Products; Guidance for Industry 1/2020 Testing of Retroviral Vecto
Read more

Stem loop RT-PCR for Detection of siRNA in Animal Tissues

Step Loop RT-PCR for Detection of Small Interfering RNA (siRNA) The recent publications described a novel used the novel method for the detection of siRNAs using a TaqMan®-based approach. This approach utilizes similar strategy that has been used for microRNA detection. The approach is illustrated in below.  In brief, the RT step occurs in the presence of a stem-loop RT primer that is complementary to the last 6–10 bases of the 3′ end of the antisense strand of the target siRNA. The stem-loop primer contains an additional universal sequence at the 5′ end that facilitates a TaqMan-based detection strategy in the subsequent qPCR step. As in the case of microRNA, the forward primer for qPCR is sequence-specific for the target siRNA. For sequence compositions that yield a low predicted melting temperature (Tm), the forward primer is designed as a tailed primer to help increase Tm. Stem Loop PCR for SiRNA Detection Step 1: Preparation of liver and plasma samples for the quantification of si
Read more

Engineering AAV vectors for enhanced safety profiles

 Engineering AAV vectors for enhanced safety profiles involves multiple strategies at both the vector genome and capsid levels. Here is a breakdown of these strategies: Vector Genome Level: Modifying Vector Genome Sequences: Scientists modify AAV vector genomes by adding, mutating, or deleting specific sequences. For example, self-complementary AAV (scAAV) vectors are designed by deleting key signals from the second inverted terminal repeat (ITR), allowing for more efficient genome replication. Codon Optimization: Optimizing the codon usage of the transgene can enhance its expression efficiency. Promoter and PolyA Sequence Selection: Careful selection and manipulation of promoter and polyadenylation (polyA) sequences can influence transgene expression and tissue specificity. Capsid Engineering: Capsid engineering strategies can be categorized into four main categories: Directed Evolution: This approach involves creating capsid mutant libraries using error-prone PCR or introducing pepti
Read more