Skip to main content

AAV5 Viral Vectors And Genome Integration Risk

Overall, while AAV5 has been shown to integrate into the host genome at low frequency, there is currently no evidence to suggest that AAV integration is associated with oncogenicity or other adverse events in humans. Ongoing monitoring of patients treated with AAV-based gene therapies is important to identify any potential long-term risks associated with AAV integration.
Following are the results from the selected publications

Nakai, H., et al. (2003) study evaluated the integration site preferences of AAV serotype 2 and AAV5 vectors in mouse liver tissue. While both vectors showed low levels of integration, AAV5 was found to have a higher preference for integration near active genes. 

Mingozzi et al. (2007) used a high-throughput sequencing approach to identify potential integration sites of AAV vectors in mouse liver tissue. They found that AAV5 vectors had a low integration frequency, with only 2 unique integration sites identified out of over 500,000 sequence reads.

Zincarelli et al. (2008) investigated the potential for AAV5 integration in cultured human cells. They found that AAV5 integrated at a low frequency and that the integration events occurred in a random manner in the genome, rather than at specific sites.

Donsante, A., et al. (2007) study analyzed the integration sites of AAV vectors, including AAV5, in mouse liver tissue that had developed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after treatment with a carcinogen. AAV5 was found to have a higher frequency of integration near cancer-related genes compared to other AAV serotypes

Wang et al. (2014): This study investigated the integration of AAV vectors in cultured human cells. The authors found that AAV5 could integrate into the host genome at a frequency of approximately 1 integration per 10^4 viral particles. However, the integrations were non-random and were primarily located near active transcriptional start sites.

Chandler et al. (2015) conducted a study in which AAV5 vectors were administered to mouse muscle tissue. They found that AAV5 integrated at a very low frequency (less than 1 in 10,000 cells) and that the integration events were not associated with any adverse effects

Nault et al. (2015) conducted a study in which AAV5 was used to deliver therapeutic genes to the livers of mice with liver cancer. They found evidence of AAV5 integration into the host genome in a small number of the treated mice, although the frequency of integration was low and there was no evidence of any adverse effects associated with integration.

Chandler, R. J., et al. (2015). Vector design influences hepatic genotoxicity after adeno-associated virus gene therapy. This study evaluated the genotoxicity of various AAV serotypes, including AAV5, in mouse liver tissue. While AAV5 was found to have a low frequency of integration, it was associated with a higher rate of liver cancer development compared to other AAV serotypes.

Chandler et al. (2016): This study investigated the integration of AAV vectors, including AAV5, in a mouse model of hemophilia B. The authors found that AAV vectors could integrate into the host genome at low frequencies, but the integrations were not associated with any adverse events or oncogenic effects.

Gil-Farina et al. (2017): This study investigated the safety of an AAV5-based gene therapy for hemophilia B in a phase 1/2 clinical trial. The authors reported no evidence of genotoxicity or adverse events related to AAV5 integration during the study.

Zeltner et al. (2017) investigated the potential for AAV5 integration in human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and found evidence of AAV5 integration at a low frequency. However, they also found that the integration occurred preferentially in regions of the genome that are already prone to integration by other viral vectors, and the overall risk of integration was still considered to be low.


Hordeaux et al. (2018) conducted a study in which AAV5 was used to deliver a therapeutic gene to the brains of nonhuman primates. They found evidence of AAV5 integration into the host genome in some of the treated animals, but the frequency of integration was low and there was no evidence of any adverse effects associated with integration.

Chandler et al. (2017) used whole-genome sequencing to analyze liver tissue from a patient who had received an AAV5-based gene therapy for hemophilia B. They found evidence of AAV5 integration into the host genome at a single site, but the integration was not associated with any adverse effects and the patient continued to benefit from the therapy.

Ginn et al. (2018): This review article summarized the current understanding of AAV integration and genotoxicity. The authors noted that while AAV5 can integrate into the host genome at low frequency, there is no evidence to suggest that AAV integration is associated with oncogenicity or other adverse events in humans.


Popular posts from this blog

Ago2 Immunoprecipitation for RISC-siRNA Quantitation

 Ago2 (Argonaute 2) immunoprecipitation (IP) is a technique used to isolate RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISC) from cell lysates. This method allows for the specific enrichment of active RISC complexes bound to small interfering RNA (siRNA) or microRNA (miRNA) within cells. By isolating these complexes, researchers can then quantify the siRNA associated with Ago2, which is an essential step in determining the efficacy of RISC loading and siRNA activity. Here’s a detailed overview of how Ago2 immunoprecipitation is performed for RISC-siRNA quantitation: Steps in Ago2 Immunoprecipitation for RISC-siRNA Quantitation Cell Lysis and Preparation of Lysate : Sample Preparation : Collect cells that have been treated with siRNA, then wash them with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove extracellular contaminants. Lysis : Lyse the cells in a gentle, RNA-preserving lysis buffer that typically includes detergents (e.g., NP-40 or Triton X-100), protease inhibitors, and RNase inhibi...
Read more

Guideline on development and manufacture of lentiviral vectors (CHMP/BWP/2458/03)

The guideline with the reference number "CHMP/BWP/2458/03" pertains to the "Guideline on Development and Manufacture of Lentiviral Vectors." This guideline was developed by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) and the Biotechnology Working Party (BWP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). It provides recommendations and regulatory guidance for the development and manufacture of lentiviral vectors, which are widely used in gene therapy and cell therapy applications. Here's an overview of the key points covered in this guideline: 1. Introduction: The guideline begins with an introduction highlighting the increasing importance of lentiviral vectors in advanced therapies and the need for guidance on their development and manufacture. 2. Scope: It defines the scope of the guideline, which covers the development and manufacture of lentiviral vectors intended for use in gene therapy and cell therapy products for human use. 3. Quality and Characte...
Read more

Stem-Loop PCR for siRNA

 Stem-loop PCR is a method often used for detecting and quantifying small RNAs, such as siRNA or miRNA, which are typically difficult to amplify directly due to their short lengths. The method involves the design of a stem-loop reverse transcription (RT) primer, which enhances specificity and stability of the short RNA during the RT-PCR process, allowing for sensitive detection and quantification of the siRNA. Here’s a detailed guide to how stem-loop PCR can be applied to siRNA detection: Key Steps in Stem-Loop PCR for siRNA Designing the Stem-Loop RT Primer : Structure : The stem-loop RT primer consists of a loop region flanked by complementary sequences on either side (the "stem"), which will fold back on itself to form a hairpin structure. Specific Binding Region : A short sequence complementary to the 3’ end of the siRNA is added at the end of the stem-loop primer to ensure specific binding to the siRNA target. Stabilization : The loop structure helps prevent primer-dimer...
Read more

FDA Guidance on Studying Multiple Versions of Cellular or Gene Therapy Products in Early-Phase Clinical Trials

 The purpose of this guidance is to offer advice to sponsors interested in conducting early-phase clinical trials for a single disease involving multiple variations of a cellular or gene therapy product. Sponsors aim to gather preliminary safety and efficacy data for these product variations within a single clinical trial. It's important to note that even though multiple product versions are studied together, each version is distinct and typically requires a separate investigational new drug application (IND) submission to the FDA. The primary goal of these early-phase clinical studies is to inform decisions about which product version(s) should be advanced for further development in later-phase trials. As such, these studies are not designed to provide the main evidence of effectiveness needed for a marketing application. They are generally not statistically powered to demonstrate a significant difference in efficacy between the different study arms. In this guidance, the FDA prov...
Read more

Human Genome Editing: FDA Draft Guidance Summary

Consideration for Developing Gene Editing Product  1. Genome Editing Methods: Genome editing can be achieved through nuclease-dependent or nuclease-independent methods. Nuclease-dependent methods involve introducing site-specific breaks in DNA using technologies like zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), modified-homing endonucleases, and CRISPR-associated (Cas) nucleases. These breaks can lead to modification of the DNA sequence at the cleavage site. Nuclease-independent methods can change DNA sequences without cleaving the DNA and include techniques like base editing and synthetic triplex-forming peptide nucleic acids. The choice of GE technology should consider factors such as the mechanism of action, the ability to target specific DNA sequences, and the potential to optimize components for efficiency, specificity, or stability. 2. Type and Degree of Genomic Modification: Different GE approaches rely on DNA repair pathways such a...
Read more