Skip to main content

Plasma Protein Binding (PPB) evaluation for GalNAc-conjugated small interfering RNA (siRNA)

The plasma protein binding (PPB) evaluation for GalNAc-conjugated small interfering RNA (siRNA) is an important parameter in understanding its pharmacokinetics (PK), distribution, and clearance from the body. GalNAc-siRNAs are designed for targeted delivery to hepatocytes via the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR), but their interaction with plasma proteins can impact their bioavailability and efficacy.

Key Considerations in PPB Evaluation of GalNAc-siRNA

  1. Purpose of Plasma Protein Binding (PPB) Evaluation

    • Distribution: Determines the extent to which the siRNA is free in plasma vs. bound to proteins, impacting its availability for hepatocyte targeting.
    • Clearance: High protein binding often reduces renal clearance, prolonging circulation time, while low protein binding may lead to rapid clearance.
    • Efficacy and Safety: Protein binding influences the siRNA’s pharmacodynamic (PD) effect by modulating its free fraction available for receptor binding.
  2. Methodology for PPB Evaluation

    • Equilibrium Dialysis or Ultrafiltration: These techniques are used to assess the free (unbound) fraction of siRNA in plasma. Both methods are widely accepted, but each has distinct benefits:
      • Equilibrium Dialysis: This technique is highly effective for small molecules and siRNAs with lower protein binding. It involves separating free drug from bound drug across a semipermeable membrane.
      • Ultrafiltration: Useful for GalNAc-siRNAs if they exhibit high protein binding, as it allows quick separation of bound and unbound fractions.
    • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) or Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC): These are advanced methods used to directly characterize binding kinetics and affinity with specific plasma proteins, such as albumin.
  3. Common Plasma Proteins Binding GalNAc-siRNA

    • Albumin: Major protein in plasma, often binds GalNAc-conjugated molecules, which can stabilize and prolong circulation.
    • α-1 Acid Glycoprotein and Lipoproteins: Although they bind at lower affinities than albumin, they still contribute to overall PPB, especially in cases of variable protein levels (e.g., disease states).
    • Binding Affinity to ASGPR: Specific to GalNAc conjugates, which are designed for receptor-mediated endocytosis into hepatocytes, ensuring targeted liver delivery.
  4. Interpreting Results and Impact on PK/PD

    • High Protein Binding: When protein binding exceeds 95%, it suggests a smaller fraction of free siRNA in circulation, potentially reducing hepatocyte uptake and ASGPR interaction.
    • Moderate to Low Protein Binding: Greater free fraction may increase clearance and hepatocyte uptake, potentially enhancing therapeutic efficacy but reducing circulation time.
    • Target Organ Delivery: For GalNAc-siRNA, moderate PPB that allows selective ASGPR binding without excessive clearance is optimal for targeting hepatocytes.
  5. Challenges in PPB Evaluation of siRNA

    • Non-covalent Interactions: siRNA can have dynamic interactions with various plasma proteins that may vary based on formulation, conjugation, and physicochemical properties.
    • Stability: GalNAc-siRNAs must be stable in plasma for accurate PPB measurements, as degradation can skew results.
    • Method Sensitivity: As siRNAs are relatively large and complex molecules, sensitivity in detecting free vs. bound fractions is crucial to avoid underestimating protein binding.

Summary

The PPB evaluation of GalNAc-siRNAs is essential in understanding their distribution, clearance, and efficacy in hepatocyte targeting. Utilizing methods like equilibrium dialysis and ultrafiltration provides insights into binding dynamics, while interpreting binding data helps optimize dosing, therapeutic window, and targeted delivery to the liver 

Popular posts from this blog

Human Genome Editing: FDA Draft Guidance Summary

Consideration for Developing Gene Editing Product  1. Genome Editing Methods: Genome editing can be achieved through nuclease-dependent or nuclease-independent methods. Nuclease-dependent methods involve introducing site-specific breaks in DNA using technologies like zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), modified-homing endonucleases, and CRISPR-associated (Cas) nucleases. These breaks can lead to modification of the DNA sequence at the cleavage site. Nuclease-independent methods can change DNA sequences without cleaving the DNA and include techniques like base editing and synthetic triplex-forming peptide nucleic acids. The choice of GE technology should consider factors such as the mechanism of action, the ability to target specific DNA sequences, and the potential to optimize components for efficiency, specificity, or stability. 2. Type and Degree of Genomic Modification: Different GE approaches rely on DNA repair pathways such a...

Stem-Loop PCR for siRNA

 Stem-loop PCR is a method often used for detecting and quantifying small RNAs, such as siRNA or miRNA, which are typically difficult to amplify directly due to their short lengths. The method involves the design of a stem-loop reverse transcription (RT) primer, which enhances specificity and stability of the short RNA during the RT-PCR process, allowing for sensitive detection and quantification of the siRNA. Here’s a detailed guide to how stem-loop PCR can be applied to siRNA detection: Key Steps in Stem-Loop PCR for siRNA Designing the Stem-Loop RT Primer : Structure : The stem-loop RT primer consists of a loop region flanked by complementary sequences on either side (the "stem"), which will fold back on itself to form a hairpin structure. Specific Binding Region : A short sequence complementary to the 3’ end of the siRNA is added at the end of the stem-loop primer to ensure specific binding to the siRNA target. Stabilization : The loop structure helps prevent primer-dimer...

Stem loop RT-PCR for Detection of siRNA in Animal Tissues

Step Loop RT-PCR for Detection of Small Interfering RNA (siRNA) The recent publications described a novel used the novel method for the detection of siRNAs using a TaqMan®-based approach. This approach utilizes similar strategy that has been used for microRNA detection. The approach is illustrated in below.  In brief, the RT step occurs in the presence of a stem-loop RT primer that is complementary to the last 6–10 bases of the 3′ end of the antisense strand of the target siRNA. The stem-loop primer contains an additional universal sequence at the 5′ end that facilitates a TaqMan-based detection strategy in the subsequent qPCR step. As in the case of microRNA, the forward primer for qPCR is sequence-specific for the target siRNA. For sequence compositions that yield a low predicted melting temperature (Tm), the forward primer is designed as a tailed primer to help increase Tm. Stem Loop PCR for SiRNA Detection Step 1: Preparation of liver and plasma samples for the quanti...

Allometric scaling in AAV gene therapy dose estimation

 Allometric scaling in AAV gene therapy dose estimation is crucial for translating effective and safe doses from animal models to humans. Since AAV dosing often involves high viral vector concentrations, proper dose scaling is essential to minimize adverse effects and optimize therapeutic outcomes. Here’s a breakdown of how allometric scaling is applied in AAV gene therapy dosing and the considerations involved: 1. Concept of Allometric Scaling Allometric scaling is a method of adjusting drug doses across species based on body size, physiology, and metabolism. It is especially useful in biologics and gene therapies where the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are more complex than small-molecule drugs. For AAV vectors, dosing is commonly scaled by body weight (e.g., vector genomes [vg] per kilogram) or body surface area (BSA), as these parameters can approximate dose distribution and vector exposure across different species. 2. Standard Scaling Approaches Body Weight Scaling (mg...

Guideline on development and manufacture of lentiviral vectors (CHMP/BWP/2458/03)

The guideline with the reference number "CHMP/BWP/2458/03" pertains to the "Guideline on Development and Manufacture of Lentiviral Vectors." This guideline was developed by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) and the Biotechnology Working Party (BWP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). It provides recommendations and regulatory guidance for the development and manufacture of lentiviral vectors, which are widely used in gene therapy and cell therapy applications. Here's an overview of the key points covered in this guideline: 1. Introduction: The guideline begins with an introduction highlighting the increasing importance of lentiviral vectors in advanced therapies and the need for guidance on their development and manufacture. 2. Scope: It defines the scope of the guideline, which covers the development and manufacture of lentiviral vectors intended for use in gene therapy and cell therapy products for human use. 3. Quality and Characte...