Skip to main content

SOP on Case Report Form (CRF) Data Entry Procedure for Clinical Trials

 Title: Case Report Form (CRF) Data Entry Procedure for Clinical Trials


Introduction and Purpose:

Case Report Forms (CRFs) are essential documents, whether in paper or electronic format, designed to systematically record all protocol-required information and results for each participant in a clinical trial. Accurate and timely data entry into the CRF is critical for ensuring the trial's proper conduct, evaluating safety and efficacy endpoints, and forming the basis for trial-related reports and publications. This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) establishes standards for the accurate and timely entry of data into CRFs for clinical trials, following International Council on Harmonization (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines. These standards should be adhered to, unless the study contract or Clinical Trial Agreement (CTA) specifies more specific requirements.


Definitions and Acronyms:

  • Clinical Research: Encompasses all research involving human participants, excluding secondary studies using existing biological specimens or data collected without identifiers or publicly available data.
  • Clinical Trial: Refers to clinical research studies involving human participants assigned to an intervention designed to evaluate the effect(s) of the intervention on the participant and the effect being evaluated is a health-related biomedical or behavioral outcome.
  • CFR: Code of Federal Regulations
  • CRO: Contract Research Organization
  • CTA: Clinical Trial Agreement
  • GCP: Good Clinical Practice
  • OSP: Office of Sponsored Projects
  • PI: Principal Investigator
  • SOP: Standard Operating Procedure


Procedure:

Case Report Form Data Entry:

  • Delegated research staff, such as study coordinators, are responsible for identifying, collecting, recording, maintaining, and making available all necessary clinical trial data in the CRF.
  • All data entered into the CRF must have available source documentation, except when source data is directly transmitted into the CRF.
  • Data entry begins after the initiation of the study and the enrollment of participants and should be completed prospectively thereafter.
  • Source documentation (clinic notes, procedure reports, test results, source forms, etc.) should be created contemporaneously with the study visit or available within 2–3 business days in the Electronic Health Record system.
  • All available data should be entered into the CRF within 10 business days of the study visit that generated the data.
  • If data availability is delayed, the PI and study personnel should make efforts to acquire and enter it into the CRF as soon as possible.
  • If the study contract or CTA specifies different data entry requirements, those should be followed instead of this SOP.
  • The PI is responsible for ensuring the accuracy, completeness, legibility, and timeliness of data collected in the CRF to ensure it aligns with the protocol.
  • Every field in the CRF should be completed, and blanks should be avoided. If CRFs are in paper format, blue or black ink should be used, and pencil should never be used.

Queries and Corrections:

  • Queries and requests for changes to CRF entries are common, often following sponsor or Contract Research Organization (CRO) monitoring visits or from data management or pharmacovigilance teams.
  • Any change or correction to a CRF should be dated, initialed, and explained if necessary, and it should not obscure the original entry to maintain an audit trail. This applies to both paper and electronic CRFs.
  • Each query should be addressed, corrected, or appropriately responded to within 10 business days of notification or issuance.

Contracts and Clinical Trial Agreements:

  • During the feasibility and contract negotiation phase for new clinical trials, the study coordinator or appropriate team member should inform the Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) program officer of the 10 business day data entry requirement outlined in this SOP. This is to prevent shorter data entry requirements from being included in the contract or CTA.

Materials Required:

  • Access to the study's paper or electronic CRF database (may require user training and logon credentials)
  • IRB-approved clinical trial protocol
  • Access to the study contract or CTA, or contact information for the responsible OSP program officer
  • Access to the Electronic Health Record and all other study source data

References:

  • 21 CFR Part 312.62: Investigator Recordkeeping and Record Retention
  • 21 CFR Part 312.68 Inspection of investigator's records and reports
  • ICH Guidance for Industry E6(R2): Good Clinical Practice 4.9

Document Approval:

Popular posts from this blog

Human Gene Therapy for Neurodegenerative Diseases: FDA Guidance Summary

  Neurodegenerative diseases are a diverse group of disorders characterized by the progressive degeneration of the central or peripheral nervous system, and they can have various causes and clinical characteristics. This guidance document is a resource for sponsors on different aspects of product development, preclinical testing, and clinical trial design. It acknowledges the unique challenges and considerations associated with developing GT products for such complex and varied diseases. Below are the key summaries from the guidance. CONSIDERATIONS FOR CHEMISTRY, MANUFACTURING AND CONTROLS (CMC) The considerations for Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) when developing gene therapy (GT) products for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases are crucial for ensuring the safety and efficacy of these advanced therapies. Here, we will elaborate on the specific CMC considerations outlined in your text: Route of Administration and Product Volume: Neurodegenerative diseases often r

Human Genome Editing: FDA Draft Guidance Summary

Consideration for Developing Gene Editing Product  1. Genome Editing Methods: Genome editing can be achieved through nuclease-dependent or nuclease-independent methods. Nuclease-dependent methods involve introducing site-specific breaks in DNA using technologies like zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), modified-homing endonucleases, and CRISPR-associated (Cas) nucleases. These breaks can lead to modification of the DNA sequence at the cleavage site. Nuclease-independent methods can change DNA sequences without cleaving the DNA and include techniques like base editing and synthetic triplex-forming peptide nucleic acids. The choice of GE technology should consider factors such as the mechanism of action, the ability to target specific DNA sequences, and the potential to optimize components for efficiency, specificity, or stability. 2. Type and Degree of Genomic Modification: Different GE approaches rely on DNA repair pathways such as ho

SOP on Investigational New Drug (IND) Application and Clinical Investigation Policy

Title: Investigational New Drug (IND) Application and Clinical Investigation Policy Introduction and Purpose: The conduct of clinical investigations (clinical trials) under an FDA-Regulated Investigational New Drug (IND) application involves compliance with a complex set of FDA regulations, requirements, and responsibilities. The FDA holds the IND application sponsor accountable for ensuring compliance with these regulations (21 CFR Part 312, Subpart D). While pharmaceutical companies are typical IND sponsors, individuals, governmental agencies, and academic institutions may also serve as sponsors (21 CFR Part 312.3). This policy serves the following purposes: To assist in determining when an IND is necessary. To provide guidance and resources for individuals conducting clinical investigations, including sponsor-investigators, on obtaining an IND for the investigational drug. To outline the process for compassionate use (expanded access) and emergency use of investigational drugs. Defi

Engineering AAV vectors for enhanced safety profiles

 Engineering AAV vectors for enhanced safety profiles involves multiple strategies at both the vector genome and capsid levels. Here is a breakdown of these strategies: Vector Genome Level: Modifying Vector Genome Sequences: Scientists modify AAV vector genomes by adding, mutating, or deleting specific sequences. For example, self-complementary AAV (scAAV) vectors are designed by deleting key signals from the second inverted terminal repeat (ITR), allowing for more efficient genome replication. Codon Optimization: Optimizing the codon usage of the transgene can enhance its expression efficiency. Promoter and PolyA Sequence Selection: Careful selection and manipulation of promoter and polyadenylation (polyA) sequences can influence transgene expression and tissue specificity. Capsid Engineering: Capsid engineering strategies can be categorized into four main categories: Directed Evolution: This approach involves creating capsid mutant libraries using error-prone PCR or introducing pepti

SOP on Safety Events Reporting In Clinical Trials

Title: Standard Operating Procedure for Collection, Evaluation, Documentation, and Reporting of Safety Events in Clinical Trials Introduction and Purpose The assessment of safety events and the accurate reporting of these events are fundamental aspects of conducting clinical trials. These processes are crucial for ensuring the safety and well-being of research participants. This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) outlines the procedures for collecting, evaluating, documenting, and reporting safety events, including Adverse Events (AE), Serious Adverse Events (SAE), Unanticipated Problems (UP), and other relevant safety events during the course of a clinical trial. The Principal Investigator (PI) holds the primary responsibility for the overall conduct of the trial, safeguarding the rights, safety, and welfare of study subjects, and ensuring that the investigation adheres to the protocol, Good Clinical Practice (GCP), Institutional Review Board (IRB), Food and Drug Administration (FDA),