Skip to main content

Overview of Cut Point Calculation in the Presence of Pre-existing Antibodies

The process involves statistical methods that account for variations in baseline ADA levels across the study population. Here’s a structured approach to calculate the cut point when there is a pre-existing antibody response:

1. Collect Baseline ADA Samples

  • Sample Population: Collect samples from a representative population of treatment-naïve subjects (typically 50-100 individuals). These baseline samples should reflect the typical range of pre-existing ADA levels within the target patient population.
  • Matrix Type: Use serum or plasma samples, as appropriate for the assay matrix.
  • Time Points: Ideally, collect multiple samples per subject pre-treatment to get a clear baseline.

2. Run Baseline Samples in ADA Assay

  • Perform the ADA assay on all baseline samples, running each sample in triplicate to account for intra-assay variability.
  • Record the response values (e.g., optical density (OD) in ELISA) for each sample. If using multiple replicates, calculate the mean response for each sample.

3. Select an Appropriate Statistical Approach

Several statistical approaches can be used, depending on the distribution of baseline ADA responses. Here are two common methods:

Parametric Approach (If Data is Normally Distributed)

  • Shapiro-Wilk Test: First, use the Shapiro-Wilk test to check for normality. If the data is normally distributed, proceed with a parametric approach.
  • Cut Point Calculation: Calculate the mean and standard deviation (SD) of baseline values. The cut point is generally set as the mean + (X * SD), where "X" is chosen based on the desired confidence level:
    • For a 95% confidence level, X = 1.645.
    • For a 99% confidence level, X = 2.33.
  • Formula: Cut Point=Mean Baseline Response+(X×SD)\text{Cut Point} = \text{Mean Baseline Response} + (X \times \text{SD})

Non-Parametric Approach (If Data is Not Normally Distributed)

  • Percentile-Based Cut Point: If baseline ADA levels are skewed or do not follow a normal distribution, use a percentile-based approach. The 95th percentile of baseline responses is commonly used for the cut point.
  • Procedure:
    • Rank baseline responses from lowest to highest.
    • Determine the response value corresponding to the 95th percentile of this data (for a one-sided 95% confidence interval).
  • Formula:
    • The cut point is the 95th percentile value, so values above this point are considered positive.

4. Incorporate Intra-Assay Variability Adjustment

  • Intra-Assay Precision Factor: To improve robustness, include a variability factor by calculating the intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) from baseline replicates. Adjust the cut point by incorporating this variability factor: Adjusted Cut Point=Unadjusted Cut Point×(1+Intra-Assay CV)\text{Adjusted Cut Point} = \text{Unadjusted Cut Point} \times (1 + \text{Intra-Assay CV})
  • This adjustment accounts for minor assay fluctuations that could affect the reproducibility of cut point determination.

5. Validate the Cut Point

  • Confirm Cut Point Reproducibility: Perform reproducibility testing using additional baseline samples. This step ensures the chosen cut point accurately distinguishes between pre-existing and treatment-emergent ADA responses.
  • Negative Control Samples: Test the cut point with negative control samples to ensure it does not inadvertently classify non-specific binding as ADA-positive.

6. Apply the Cut Point to Post-Treatment Samples

  • Once established, apply the cut point to post-treatment ADA samples to classify responses as positive or negative. Samples exceeding this cut point indicate a likely treatment-induced ADA response.

Example Calculation

Assume the baseline data (OD values) follows a normal distribution with a mean of 0.250 and an SD of 0.050:

  1. Parametric Cut Point: For a 95% confidence level:

    Cut Point=0.250+(1.645×0.050)=0.250+0.08225=0.332\text{Cut Point} = 0.250 + (1.645 \times 0.050) = 0.250 + 0.08225 = 0.332
    • Here, any post-treatment ADA response above 0.332 is considered positive.

  2. Non-Parametric Cut Point: Using a 95th percentile approach, if the 95th percentile of baseline values is 0.340, then 0.340 is set as the cut point.

Summary

Calculating the ADA cut point in the presence of pre-existing antibodies involves collecting robust baseline data, selecting an appropriate statistical method, and validating the threshold. This cut point ensures accurate differentiation between natural baseline antibodies and treatment-induced ADA, critical for assessing AAV gene therapy safety and efficacy.

Popular posts from this blog

Human Genome Editing: FDA Draft Guidance Summary

Consideration for Developing Gene Editing Product  1. Genome Editing Methods: Genome editing can be achieved through nuclease-dependent or nuclease-independent methods. Nuclease-dependent methods involve introducing site-specific breaks in DNA using technologies like zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), modified-homing endonucleases, and CRISPR-associated (Cas) nucleases. These breaks can lead to modification of the DNA sequence at the cleavage site. Nuclease-independent methods can change DNA sequences without cleaving the DNA and include techniques like base editing and synthetic triplex-forming peptide nucleic acids. The choice of GE technology should consider factors such as the mechanism of action, the ability to target specific DNA sequences, and the potential to optimize components for efficiency, specificity, or stability. 2. Type and Degree of Genomic Modification: Different GE approaches rely on DNA repair pathways such as ho
Read more

FDA Guidance on Studying Multiple Versions of Cellular or Gene Therapy Products in Early-Phase Clinical Trials

 The purpose of this guidance is to offer advice to sponsors interested in conducting early-phase clinical trials for a single disease involving multiple variations of a cellular or gene therapy product. Sponsors aim to gather preliminary safety and efficacy data for these product variations within a single clinical trial. It's important to note that even though multiple product versions are studied together, each version is distinct and typically requires a separate investigational new drug application (IND) submission to the FDA. The primary goal of these early-phase clinical studies is to inform decisions about which product version(s) should be advanced for further development in later-phase trials. As such, these studies are not designed to provide the main evidence of effectiveness needed for a marketing application. They are generally not statistically powered to demonstrate a significant difference in efficacy between the different study arms. In this guidance, the FDA prov
Read more

Stem loop RT-PCR for Detection of siRNA in Animal Tissues

Step Loop RT-PCR for Detection of Small Interfering RNA (siRNA) The recent publications described a novel used the novel method for the detection of siRNAs using a TaqMan®-based approach. This approach utilizes similar strategy that has been used for microRNA detection. The approach is illustrated in below.  In brief, the RT step occurs in the presence of a stem-loop RT primer that is complementary to the last 6–10 bases of the 3′ end of the antisense strand of the target siRNA. The stem-loop primer contains an additional universal sequence at the 5′ end that facilitates a TaqMan-based detection strategy in the subsequent qPCR step. As in the case of microRNA, the forward primer for qPCR is sequence-specific for the target siRNA. For sequence compositions that yield a low predicted melting temperature (Tm), the forward primer is designed as a tailed primer to help increase Tm. Stem Loop PCR for SiRNA Detection Step 1: Preparation of liver and plasma samples for the quantification of si
Read more

Human Gene Therapy for Neurodegenerative Diseases: FDA Guidance Summary

  Neurodegenerative diseases are a diverse group of disorders characterized by the progressive degeneration of the central or peripheral nervous system, and they can have various causes and clinical characteristics. This guidance document is a resource for sponsors on different aspects of product development, preclinical testing, and clinical trial design. It acknowledges the unique challenges and considerations associated with developing GT products for such complex and varied diseases. Below are the key summaries from the guidance. CONSIDERATIONS FOR CHEMISTRY, MANUFACTURING AND CONTROLS (CMC) The considerations for Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) when developing gene therapy (GT) products for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases are crucial for ensuring the safety and efficacy of these advanced therapies. Here, we will elaborate on the specific CMC considerations outlined in your text: Route of Administration and Product Volume: Neurodegenerative diseases often r
Read more

Standard Template For Clinical Study Report (CSR)-Gene Therapy

 A Standard Format for a Clinical Study Report (CSR) typically includes the following sections and components: Title Page: Title of the Clinical Study Report Study Title Protocol Number Version Date Sponsor's Name and Logo Date of Report Compilation Table of Contents: A list of all sections, subsections, and appendices with page numbers for easy navigation. List of Abbreviations and Glossary: A compilation of all abbreviations used throughout the report, along with their definitions. Executive Summary: A concise overview of the study, including objectives, methods, key findings, and conclusions. Introduction: Background and rationale for the study. Study objectives and hypotheses. Study Design and Methods: Detailed information about the study design, including: Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study population and recruitment. Randomization and blinding procedures. Data collection methods and tools. Statistical analysis plan. Ethical Considerations: Information on ethical approval
Read more